Technically, I could ignore all of the rapidly approaching assignments, deadlines, and exams and watch House of Cards all day. But the thing is, I just don't want to. I've always been the person that's up for a challenge, actively seeking out competition especially in the classroom. Plus, all you type-A's out there will be nodding your heads when I mention how reassuring a steady routine is in daily life. So, here's what's been keeping me academically busy this past term.
Advanced Higher Geography has been given the unfortunate nickname of "Advanced Higher Coloring," because of all the maps and graphs. Well, it's not entirely a false notion. We do get the privilege of tracing, drawing, and coloring, which is (not surprisingly) quite relaxing. But Geography is much more difficult than people might say. Throughout the year, I've spent hundreds of hours gathering and processing data, citing sources, and yes, filling in all those diagrams with colored pencils. A graph you might see in a newspaper or in a magazine looks so simple, but there's so much work that goes into it, and even more so when they are hand-drawn. Even the "coloring" part of the subject can be excruciating: the letters must be exactly the same length, all the lines steady and at the perfect angle, and all the colors a consistent shade.
As I've probably mentioned in the past, I have two main projects in geography that I've been working on for almost the entire year-- a geographical study and a geographical issue. The former involves more primary data, in order to prove our proficiency in data gathering and processing techniques. I've studied the nearby city of Stirling and its environmental quality through both a survey and a questionnaire, both of which took too many hours in the cold and wind looking stupid as I strolled through the city center with a trundle wheel. The questionnaire was especially grueling, and I was almost in tears by the end because nobody wanted to respond. Eventually, I did get enough data to prove the statistical significance of these four hypotheses:
If you're interested, I found the first two to be statistically significant. |
The latter project, the issue, is a much broader undertaking that involves comparing different sources that address varying viewpoints to a certain geographical problem. I chose the topic of food security in Sub-Saharan Africa, mainly because one of my best friends at Culver (hey, Clare!) did a project on it in her senior year, and it greatly piqued my interest. To sum up 3000 words, thirteen sources, and numerous graphs, I am basically arguing that the use of innovative farming science technology will be a better option to counteract food security compared to minimizing food waste or increasing the ability to respond to food emergencies in the developed world (although all, of course, will be helpful in some way). This project was undoubtedly more interesting and engaging than the study: there are only so many times where you can do a Pearson's Product test to find a statistical correlation and still be excited about it. Here's a graph that I'm particularly proud of:
Those bananas took way too long. |
Politics class, while less of a burden than Geography, doesn't quite let me off the hook. We are currently in the process of writing and memorizing our assignments, which we will write in an official exam setting later in March. We are given the fantastic gift of being able to choose the subject of our own assignment; naturally, I chose to discuss the constitutionality of Trump's executive order in January barring the immigration of seven Muslim-majority countries. What's funny, though, was that I went into the project thinking, "I am so going to prove this is illegal. Immigration and Nationality Act. Fourteenth Amendment. So there." But after further consideration, I actually had to switch my position on the issue. Eye-opening, but annoying when you've already written two pages on it. I still don't agree that the executive order was the best way to keep the US's national security intact, but I found some provisions in the law that were simply too significant to ignore. For example, I used US Code 1182 as one of my arguments, which states, "he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate" in the event of national security. He is the Commander-in-Chief, so he technically has the ability to say who can come and who can't. Interesting stuff, huh? It's a complicated issue, though, and now I have the ability to argue both ways.
The project has really caused me to look past my biases and focus on what the law actually says, instead of what I want it to be. Being a lawyer wouldn't be my first choice as a profession, but it sure was enthralling to pretend I was for a few weeks. The actually writing is done now, so now I just have to memorize all the facts... from Sally Yate's resignation date (30 Jan) to the number of Somalis that have attempted terror attacks in the US since 1975 (six). Fun stuff.
So that's the bulk of my current work. Modern Studies had its assignment back in the fall, and now the focus is primarily on democracy and voting behavior... which would be my third class on it in two years. In other words, not a problem at all.
On another note, I was able to get away from the books on Wednesday to participate in Dollar Academy's Cross Country Championships. We followed a wonderfully muddy route up through the Ochil Hills in only a little rain-- much to my surprise, I found myself able to run for the majority of the way! Dollar's page has a story on it, if you'd like to read more about it. It was definitely a great way to take a break and see the beautiful Scottish countryside.
After the run-- note the disheveled hair and dirt on my nose. |
Very artistic bananas, and I request a photo of the muddy shoes.
ReplyDelete